Medical abbreviations 'pose risk'

[Pchan 5,162]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/7171453.stm

Doctors are being warned that using abbreviations in medical notes is putting patients' lives at risk. The UK's Medical Defence Union said difficulties often arose because abbreviations can have more than one meaning or might be misread.

Some patients have had the wrong limb removed or operated on and others have been given deadly drug doses, it said.

A recent US study of 30,000 medication errors, some fatal, showed 5% were linked to abbreviations in notes.

Abbreviations can cause confusion and risk patient safety

Dr Sally Old, MDU medico-legal adviser

Common errors included abbreviating drug names and dosages, the Joint Commission found.

An example involved a 62-year-old patient on haemodialysis who was treated for a viral infection with the drug acyclovir.

The order for acyclovir was written as "acyclovir (unknown dose) with HD", meaning haemodialysis. Acyclovir should be adjusted for renal impairment and given only once daily.

However, the order was misread as TID (three times daily) and the patient died as a result.

Fatal errors

A UK audit by the paediatric department at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, published in the Archives of Disease in Childhood in November, found instances where abbreviations used had caused confusion because they had multiple interpretations.

For example, "TOF" could be taken to mean "tetralogy of fallot" or "tracheo-oesophageal fistula" - two completely different conditions.

When presented with a selection of abbreviations, the study authors found paediatric doctors agreed on the interpretation of 56-94%, while other healthcare professionals recognised only 31-63%.

The authors also found that the use of abbreviations was inconsistent - 15% of the abbreviations used in medical notes appeared in the hospital's intranet dictionary while 17% appeared in a medical dictionary used by paediatric secretaries.

The MDU, which defends members' reputations when their clinical performance is called into question, advises doctors to use only the abbreviations or acronyms that are unambiguous and approved in their practice or hospital.

Dr Sally Old, MDU medico-legal adviser, said: "Abbreviations can cause confusion and risk patient safety.

"In one instance a diabetic patient was given a dose of 61 units of insulin because the notes say six international units - 6IU - were misinterpreted.

"Thankfully, the error was spotted and the patient was treated."

She said clear, concise communication was essential, particularly when care was provided by multi-disciplinary teams.

Kevin Cleary, of the National Patient Safety Agency, said: "Abbreviations in clinical notes, prescriptions and treatment charts should be kept to an absolute minimum. They cause confusion and present a risk to patients.

"The NPSA is aware of at least one patient death in the last 12 months where abbreviations were a contributory factor.

"In response to this incident, involving chemotherapy, we will be issuing guidance later this month on clear communication of treatment protocols."

[Sledgstone 8,672]

As if it wasn't bad enough that doctors already write illegible, now they f*ck people up with TLA.

[Ladywriter 7,783]

wrong limb?

[Mathias 426]

My doctors type out the prescriptions.

[Ladywriter 7,783]

this gives me Kingdom Hospital flashbacks. Steg operated on the wrong side of her brain >.<

[AMI 195]

WOW SCARRY!!!! And my doc. wants to do another knee surgery well know i got an even better reason to say NO! Theres no need to have a scare on the right one if they get the leg wrong! LOL! "gulp!":holyhell:

[Saiel 2,306]

Some of those examples worry me not about abbreviations, but medical staff.

Even if a note clearly said a diabetic patient should receive 61 units of insulin, or Acyclovir TID, the person fulfilling that request should realize the amount seems excessive and double check with the doctor caring for that patient. If on someone's chart it said "Slap in face QH," I would hope the nurse, technician, or whoever would double-check the order before blindly following it.

[Pchan 5,162]

That is a valid point Saiel. I wonder though if nurses even have a lot of time on their hands to check those sorta things only cos I assume they're running around all the time from patient to patient