Ladywriter 7,783 Report post Posted July 8, 2008 Agency cites uncertain jurisdiction after 2006 Supreme Court ruling WASHINGTON - The Bush administration didn't pursue hundreds of potential water pollution cases after a 2006 Supreme Court decision that restricted the Environmental Protection Agency's authority to regulate seasonal streams and wetlands.From July 2006 through December 2007 there were 304 instances where the EPA found what would have been violations of the Clean Water Act before the court's ruling, according to a memo by the agency's enforcement chief. Officials "chose not to pursue formal enforcement based on the uncertainty about EPA's jurisdiction," according to the memo, which was released Monday by two Democratic House committee chairmen. The EPA also chose to "lower the priority" of 147 other cases because it was unclear whether the intermittent streams, swamps and marshes flowed into navigable waterways. Chief Justice John Roberts predicted the court's decision would be confusing, saying "regulated entities will now have to feel their way on a case-by-case basis." The confusion primarily surrounds temporary streams and wetlands not large enough to be navigable, but which are among the most prevalent types of waters across the country. The EPA and the Army Corps of Engineers issued a guidance document in July 2007 that said officials must first analyze whether an ephemeral stream or seasonal wetland leads to federal waters before federal water pollution laws can be enforced. "These intermittent and ephemeral waters are vital to the protection of our nation's streams and rivers," wrote Assistant Administrator Granta Nakayama in the March 2008 memo commenting on the agency's guidance, which he said "impeded our efforts to pursue enforcement." Nakayama, in an interview Monday with The Associated Press, said the agency was simply responding to a "changed legal landscape." "We need to ensure that the case, the facts of the case, establish federal jurisdiction," he said *sigh* Look at the flowers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Myk JL 1,731 Report post Posted July 8, 2008 That really sucks... Those who fight deplorables should see to it that they themselves do not become deplorables. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites