Ladywriter 7,783 Report post Posted November 5, 2008 In less than two weeks, bureaucrats at the National Organics Standards Board will be deciding whether fish exposed to mercury and highly toxic polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), or raised in farms that contaminate the environment, can be labeled organic. Personally, I expect the organic label to mean high standards. I believe in spending a bit more on quality food that is safe for my family and the environment. But selling toxic fish under the organic label? That defeats the whole purpose! Tell the National Organics Standards Board that you expect higher standards: http://www.care2.com/go/z/e/ABHA2/xIw6/ANR12 The board is considering two situations that would lower the organic standards. One is labeling fish organic even if it is fed wild fish. But some wild- caught fish come from polluted environments and are high in mercury and PCBs, which would transfer and compound those toxins in the fish sold under the organic label. The second problem is labeling fish raised in open ocean net pens as organic. Ocean net pens, such as those used to farm salmon, can be highly polluting, with a great deal of waste and disease entering the surrounding natural ecosystems. Organic production should be environmentally sound -- not pollute our environment. We have less than two weeks to demand high standards for organic fish. Please take a moment to sign the petition today and defend "organic"! http://www.care2.com/go/z/e/ABHA2/xIw6/ANR12 Thanks for taking action! Natasha Care2 Campaign Team Look at the flowers Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DeathscytheX 9,732 Report post Posted November 6, 2008 I never really looked into why this is the case, but it really baffles me how organic milk has a shelf life 3x greater than regular milk. GET A NEW FUNK ON BEFORE YOU GET DUMPED ON! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites