Myk JL

Because you have implied that Ron Paul might follow in Hitler's exact foot steps. You say before WWII then you go on as if some how Ron Paul may go & throw his ideals out the window & start a war. You directed this conclusion soley to Ron Paul & none of the other candidates. Not to McCain who wants to bomb Iran & has made statements about a 100 year war. Not to Obama who might continue the War On Terror in Iraq. And not to Hillary who voted for the war only to change her mind later. Tell anyone someone is like Hitler & the 1st thing that comes to mind is WWII; not the years before.

OK. You single Ron Paul out as a the most likely to start a war based on similarities you say he has with Hitler?How is this similar to Ron Paul or is this just a shot in the dark? And as for your last paragraph saying you have proof & not showing you have proof? Because I might prove you wrong? You can not make such a case that Ron Paul is similar to Hitler if you have no real evidence to show. And then blame me because I don't find your evidence.

You're not showing any real proof. Just saying you have proof. And saying Ron Paul would start a war is ridiculous. Over & over again he has stated that preemptive strikes/wars we have been fighting are unconstitutional. And Ron Paul has a way more solid history than the other candidates who have flip flopped.

Didn't Obama also get stuck on explaining himself when he said he'd leave Iraq & fight terrorist where ever they are? Only to then be reminded terrorist have been in Iraq since we got there? That just might remove the idea of our troops leaving Iraq if he wants the other too. I like Ron Paul's speech that you can't have a war on a tactic.

I smell an Oscar!... And a wierd thought of one of them cosplaying as Epyon...

That comparison I'd say is really misinformed. Ron Paul isn't the kind of guy who would have started a war. The man is a strict constitutionalist. Such a nasty statement could draw that our forefathers would have agreed with Hitler. The 2 democrats that had been duking it out have had the pretty much the same social ideals. While the "final" Republican is all for preemptive strikes and wants to bomb Iran.

Once the battle is over Samuel L. Jackson lands the jet and says he's tired of these mother fucking transformers references in this mother fucking movie. Once the credits end the jet transforms into a magic bullet blender pissing off a lot of robot fans that thought it would be StarScream.

I agree. Where ever this goes it will either lean towards the Democrats Communist Ideals or the Republicans Nazi Ideals. It's not like this wasn't predictable. Most people are sheep for the mass media.

With a twist ending where the plane transforms into a robot...

I wonder what the reaction would have been if the shirt had said "Anti-Guns"?

Out of all of those the only one that I'm close enough to trusting is Exxposing Exxon.

Usually as I already stated this is due to government in bed with businesses. GP & WWF from what I've read have done nothing but harass businesses. So when it comes to the environment I'm more likely to lean towards websites about Green Collar Jobs. At least they're not trying to put anyone out on the streets. Never said it wasn't our Earth. However the main focus should be on property rights as no one completely owns the Earth.

I think the possibility still stands that farming fish would help greatly. Corporations create jobs. The only times I know of when corporations are in the wrong is when they pollute other peoples property or underpay their workers. You don't need Green Peace or WWF to do that. If anything they just take the opposite extreme of the other. The other being big business in bed with big government.

How about slapping someone in public because sexual harassment? If you have someone demanding on a daily basis that you quit your job eventually you're going to snap. As for over fishing the real problem comes from a lack of innovation in the market. If they could farm fish in tanks there wouldn't be a major problem. But it's not like Green Peace is making that actual effort. They're just harassing some guys who are trying to keep their jobs & stay providers for their families.

Harrassing people out of jobs that hurts no one should be protected?

... Meaning what exactly?

Wow... This is going to suck...

This sounds like good news!

IMO Greenpeace got what it deserved. Bunch of nuts that usually want governments to increase there powers against business & people. Then again Tuna is meh most of the time as the only thing that actually taste good is what ever is covering up the taste of Tuna.

Vroom! Wii passes Xbox 360 in US It finally happened!...

Yeah a gun for hunting can also be used for defense.You completely forget all the illegal ways to get a gun. If they don't eat it, it's at least one more deer off the road. Criminals are less likely to commit a crime on a gun owner. You completely forgot the gun town USA article. The crime the criminal usually wants to commit is on those that usually don't have guns. Comics aren't where I'd go to for a sound defense. Especially when it comes to real situations. One guy outdoing an entire police forces job. That's just not only ridiculous, but shows how badly armed the police can be when dealing with real situations. In such a situation with Rap & GTA/Games the real problem is most likely parenting or lack of. There has also been proof that crime has decreased over the years as video games have gotten more advance. Most people who buy Rap & GTA/Games don't commit crimes. Removing guns from society will only lead to more gun crimes. Not to mention no guns for defense would lead to more violent crimes. I've never had the fear of a drive by because I've never lived in a gun free zone. And I don't go to school anymore so it's currently impossible for me to be worried about being in a school shooting. Not to mention school shootings & drive bys happen in gun free zones. Now you're just exaggerating things that don't happen on a daily, monthly or maybe even a yearly basis.

Three thoughts come to mind... The damn thing is too big to copy DS... Point to kill without click seems more accurate, but dirty... Without right click this might as well be a Mac...

But chances are any gun most likely used to kill a deer can kill a person so your non lethal weapon seems pointless.

Who are these celebrities who cause killing sprees? Non lethal deer hunting sounds really boring. And that 200 year old freedom helps more than you want to admit.

I take offence to your anti-gun comments because you want the US to remove the 2nd Amendment.When a government makes something illegal the crime goes up. This has applied to alcohol, drugs, & even guns. Blaming media, music & TV is just basically the same thing Jack Thompson has done with Video Games. It doesn't solve the real problem, but makes wild guesses with very little proof. Crime is never a wise life style, but as long as naive laws exist it will only make crime worse. You want a better life for your kids do all that you can to better yourself and not take the easy way out by blaming objects. Blaming it on objects like guns is another way to relate to Jack Thompson. Dumb asses should know better not to break into some one's house. And shooting them is always a last resort. And if it wasn't a gun for defence it might be a knife, hammer, etc. They still would end up dead depending on how I use it. I don't consider this off topic as guns were mentioned in the 1st post.