Ladywriter

U_9p2eepVQo y8iVE8f0XHc

kE_C1FXRo20 u6trH81xpko rQCxVcuxxxk da fuck?

Keith Olbermann Proves Condi Rice Is A Liar 1ASBuh72Re8 Gordon Ross analyses the destruction of the World Trade Center - 25 min - Jul 5, 2007 Engineer Gordon Ross MEng. at the Indian YMCA, London on the 8th June 2007 analyses the destruction of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center on September 11th 2001.

just had to laugh McCain's YouTube Problem Just Became a Nightmare GEtZlR3zp4c

Suits slap Supercenter Suits slap Supercenter By Joe Nelson YUCCA VALLEY - Two environmental groups have filed lawsuits against this town and Wal-Mart Stores Inc., challenging a planned Wal-Mart Supercenter. In separate lawsuits filed Wednesday in San Bernardino County Superior Court, the Center for Biological Diversity and the Morongo Basin Conservation Association allege that bringing the big-box retailer to the low desert community would increase greenhouse emissions and spur "economic degradation" and "urban decay." Yucca Valley Town Manager Andy Takat was out of the office Thursday and unavailable for comment. Town Clerk Janet Anderson said she had not yet received the lawsuits and therefore could not comment. The nonprofit Center for Biological Diversity alleges Wal-Mart isn't living up to its goal of supplying 100 percent renewable energy to its stores by refusing to incorporate cost-effective features like solar panels. "It's time for Wal-Mart to put its money where its mouth is and promote renewable energy for every new store, as it's committed to," said Jonathan Evans, a spokesman for the center. "It can't reach the goal of 100 percent renewable energy by ignoring solar panels in the desert." The Morongo Basin Conservation Association alleges that a market analysis included in the environmental impact report was flawed. The analysis projected steady residential and economic growth in Yucca Valley that would support the Supercenter, but current data shows that such growth has stalled, the association says. "There are over 600 empty homes in Yucca Valley alone, and the water district reports over 900 inactive connections," according to a news release issued by the group Thursday. The group also said there is more than 119,000 square feet of empty retail space. John Mendez, spokesman for Southern California Wal-Mart Stores Inc., said Thursday he had not yet reviewed the lawsuits and therefore could not address specific allegations. He did say, however, that the pending litigation will only stall the development of something that would provide a valuable resource for Yucca Valley's citizens and economy. "It will needlessly delay a sound decision made by the Yucca Valley (Town) Council, and more importantly, hurt the pocketbooks of thousands of Yucca Valley and Morongo Basin working-class families," Mendez said. The Yucca Valley Town Council gave the Supercenter the green light about a month ago. It will neighbor the Home Depot on Twentynine Palms Highway, west of Hermosa Avenue, Mendez said.

NBC11.com, August 5, 2008 States, Enviros Warn EPA Over Ship, Aircraft Emissions Environment News Service WASHINGTON, DC -- Formal letters warning of impending lawsuits over the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's failure to address greenhouse gas emissions from ocean-going ships and aircraft have been filed by four state attorneys general, three state agencies, New York City and a coalition of conservation groups. The conservation groups' notice of intent to sue was filed Thursday by the public interest law firm Earthjustice on behalf of Oceana, Friends of the Earth and the Center for Biological Diversity. The state and local jurisdictions filed similar notices on the same day, declaring their intent to sue the EPA for unreasonable delay. The states California, Connecticut, Oregon, New Jersey, and the California Air Resources Board, South Coast Air Quality Management District, New York City, and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection also filed notices of intent to sue in 180 days. California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. said, "Ships, aircraft and industrial equipment burn huge quantities of fossil fuel and cause massive greenhouse gas pollution yet President Bush stalls with one bureaucratic dodge after another." "Because Bush's Environmental Protection Agency continues to wantonly ignore its duty to regulate pollution, California is forced to seek judicial action," he said. According to a report issued Thursday by Oceana, aircraft currently account for 12 percent of carbon dioxide emissions from U.S. transportation sources and three percent of the United States' total carbon dioxide emissions. The United States is responsible for nearly half of worldwide carbon dioxide emissions from aircraft. The global fleet of marine vessels releases almost three percent of the world's carbon dioxide, an amount comparable to the emissions of the entire country of Canada. Because of their huge numbers and inefficient operating practices, marine vessels release a large volume of global warming pollutants, particularly carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide and soot. Despite their impact on the global climate, greenhouse gas emissions from ships are not regulated by the U.S. government, nor are these emissions limited under the Kyoto Protocol. The coalition of environmental groups filed petitions to the EPA in October and December 2007, requesting that the agency determine whether greenhouse gas emissions from marine vessels and aircraft endanger public health and welfare, and if so, to issue regulations to control greenhouse gas emissions from these sources. The coalition asked for a response within 180 days but did not receive one. Instead, the coalition and the state and local jurisdictions contend that the EPA delayed its legal obligations by issuing an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, ANPR, on July 11, 2008. The ANPR does not make a finding as to whether EPA intends to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, as the Supreme Court determined it was required to do in a 2007 ruling in the case of Massachusetts vs EPA. Nor does the ANPR draw any conclusions about how to protect public health and welfare from global warming pollutants. Instead, the ANPR compiles comments from other government agencies on the subject of regulating greenhouse gas emissions, reviews provisions of the Clean Air Act, and raises numerous issues regarding potential regulations. In hundreds of pages, the ANPR avoids answering key relevant questions - whether greenhouse gases endanger public health or welfare, and if so, how and when it will take action. "More than 15 months after the Supreme Court's order, EPA, once again, has ignored its legal and moral obligation to act quickly to protect the health and welfare of Americans," said Martin Wagner of Earthjustice, who is representing the coalition of environmental groups. "The Bush administration is wasting precious time with continued foot-dragging - time that we don't have. We have gone to court to force action by this or the next administration," he said. "Scientists are reporting that global climate change is damaging our oceans and our daily lives, even more rapidly than forecast," said Dr. Michael Hirshfield, Oceana's chief scientist and senior vice president for North America. "Does the EPA think climate change will go away by itself? 'We'll think about it tomorrow' is an unconscionable conclusion for an agency whose mission is to protect the environment." "The latest Bush administration tactic on global warming seems to be 'if you can't beat them, delay them,'" said Danielle Fugere, Western Regional Program -irector for Friends of the Earth. "Instead of taking action on global warming pollution from shipping and aviation - two of the fastest growing sources of carbon dioxide emissions worldwide - EPA is yet again putting the brakes on developing innovative global warming solutions." The EPA has refused to regulate emissions from nonroad engines, aircraft and ocean-going vessels despite "unassailable evidence of global warming and dangerous foreign oil dependency," says California Attorney General Brown. Brown cites a report on global warming issued last week by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program, which predicts more frequent and intense hurricanes, heat waves, and flooding. In California, where hydropower makes up roughly 15 percent of in-state energy production, Brown says diminishing snowmelt flowing through dams will decrease the potential for hydropower production by up to 30 percent by the end of the century. "If we're going to slow the melting of the Arctic and save not only the polar bear but thousands of species around the world, we need to implement highly effective existing environmental laws like the Clean Air Act," said Kassie Siegel, Climate Program director for the Center for Biological Diversity. "Regulating greenhouse pollution from ships and aircraft under the Clean Air Act is a necessary first step towards solving the climate crisis."

The Beijing Olympics should be a moment to bring citizens around the world together. But the Chinese government still hasn't opened meaningful dialogue on Tibet, or made progress on Burma and Darfur -- and global activists' messages are too often lost in a firestorm of accusations about being anti-Chinese. We've decided to take the moment back with a powerful, unambiguous message of peace, friendship and dialogue -- the Olympic Handshake. The handshake began with the Dalai Lama, passing through the streets of London, now it's gone online where all of us can join in -- help the handshake travel toward Beijing, where our message will be delivered through a big Olympic media campaign before the closing ceremonies. Join the handshake, and see yourself and others as it goes around the globe! go

Feds Prepare Subpoena for Mary-Kate in Heath Drug Case Guess Mary-Kate Olsen hasn't given officials all the "relevant information" they needed in the Heath Ledger case after all. Days after a formal statement from the twin's rep proclaiming her innocence and insisting Olsen has fully cooperated with the Drug Enforcement Administration's investigation into how Ledger obtained medications sans prescription, E! News has confirmed a subpoena with the star's name on it is ready and waiting to be delivered. "It was dated and signed on April 23, but it has not been enforced yet," says a federal law-enforcement source, denying reports circulating earlier today that Olsen had already been served. "We are still in negotiations. There are still negotiations with Mary-Kate's lawyer and also with our U.S. Attorney's Office, the prosecutors." Should negotiations with Team Olsen fall through, the subpoena will be issued, requiring the former Full Houser to be queried in front of a grand jury. Should she cooperate, as her attorney says she has been, there will be no need for the strong-arm tactics. DEA officials are trying to determine where and how the late Ledger obtained prescriptions for OxyContin and Vicodin. The onetime Oscar nominee died of an accidental overdose on Jan. 22. Olsen was the first person called by the masseuse who discovered Ledger's body, leading her to dispatch her security team to the Manhattan apartment. Earlier this week, sources confirmed that Olsen was refusing to cooperate with the federal probe unless she was granted immunity in the case—something the feds say is not on the table. But the news prompted a statement from Olsen's attorney. "Despite tabloid speculation, Mary-Kate Olsen has nothing whatsoever to do with the drugs found in Heath Ledger's home or his body, and does not know where he obtained them," Michael C. Miller said Monday. While Miller did not address the reports that Olsen was seeking immunity from the feds, he did call descriptions of the investigation "incomplete and inaccurate." Mary-Kate Olsen: 'Hillbilly Heroin' for Heath Ledger? NOncGv2ExlY Mary Kate Olsen Asks for Immunity in Heath Ledger Case EA44EXy6Z2s Dan Abrams - Heath Ledger - Mary Kate Olsen - 20080805 m1zu2H0fPa0

Ron Suskind's new book offers the smoking gun on Bush admin's deception. TVQILFKcQDo Watch more at www.theyoungturks.com Think Progress has the full story on Suskind's allegations.

yeah... and conveniently he's a little too dead to answer any questions... xRYHQVkQJ7U

U.S. officials: Scientist was anthrax killer WASHINGTON - The government's case was circumstantial but seemingly damning.Army scientist Bruce Ivins had possession of purified anthrax spores linked to the deadly 2001 attacks. He worked alone. He submitted false anthrax samples to FBI officials to throw investigators off his trail. He tried to frame unnamed co-workers and threatened to kill anyone who wronged him. When investigators asked Ivins about his "late laboratory work hours," the brilliant yet deeply troubled 62-year-old didn't have an explanation. As the circumstantial evidence mounted, authorities said, they were certain they had the perpetrator of the five anthrax poisoning deaths that followed closely after the airliner terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. Then, when investigators told Ivins they were going to charge him in the deaths, he committed suicide. "We regret that we will not have the opportunity to present evidence to the jury," U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Taylor said Wednesday as court documents in the case were unsealed and the government made its case publicly. Ivins was solely responsible for the anthrax attacks, the government declared, saying only he had custody of highly purified anthrax spores with "certain genetic mutations identical" to the poison used in the attacks. Investigators also said they had traced back to his lab the type of envelopes used to send the deadly powder through the mails. Ivins' attorney, Paul Kemp, said the government was "taking a weird guy and convicting him of mass murder" without real evidence. Taylor conceded the evidence was largely, if not wholly, circumstantial. Noting that Ivins would have been entitled to a presumption of innocence, Taylor nevertheless said prosecutors were confident "we could prove his guilt to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt." Portrait of increasingly desperate man The newly released court records depict Ivins, who had been troubled by mental health problems for years, as increasingly desperate as he confronted the possibility of being charged. "He said he was not going to face the death penalty, but instead had a plan to kill co-workers and other individuals who had wronged him," according to one affidavit. In e-mails to colleagues, Ivins described a feeling of dual personalities, the documents said. The FBI's investigation had dragged on for years, tarnishing the reputation of the agency in the process. Investigators had long focused on Steven J. Hatfill, whose career as a bioscientist was ruined after then-Attorney General John Ashcroft named him a "person of interest" in the case in 2002. The government recently paid $6 million to settle a lawsuit by Hatfill, who worked in the same lab as Ivins. Taylor said investigators concluded in 2005 that Hatfill couldn't have had access to a crucial flask of anthrax spores. The prosecutor called the flask the murder weapon in the worst case of bioterror in the nation's history. Authorities say that language Ivins used in an e-mail days before a second round of anthrax attacks was similar to the messages in anthrax-laced letters received soon after by Democratic Sens. Tom Daschle and Patrick Leahy. In the e-mail, Ivins wrote that "Bin Laden terrorists for sure have anthrax and sarin gas" and have "just decreed death to all Jews and all Americans." The letters to Daschle and Leahy said: "WE HAVE THIS ANTHRAX . . . DEATH TO AMERICA . . . DEATH TO ISRAEL." Private meetings with victims' families Wednesday's documents were released as FBI Director Robert Mueller met privately with families of the victims of the attacks to lay out the evidence officials. As for motive, investigators seemed to offer two possible reasons for the attacks: that the brilliant scientist wanted to bolster support for a vaccine he helped create and that the anti-abortion Catholic targeted two pro-choice Catholic lawmakers. etc.....

Chevron Lobbies White House to stop $12 Billion lawsuit part one of 2 (audio is somewhat off) LAuGAzK_K0I

boxing ne? might have ta check it

Body of War stuff Part one of ... WPPUqh4E5Es

I just had to share this. Phil Bill Ctlmholr45c

Mountain-top removal coal mining and coalbed methane extraction are threatening a pristine area on the border of Montana and Canada. Send a message to the Canadian ambassador to the U.S. and ask him to protect this area! http://go.care2.com/e/8aMz/VgoV/ANR12 Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park, which spans the border between Montana and Canada, is a globally significant biological hotspot, protecting elk, moose, deer, mountain goats, bull trout and a host of other wildlife and plant species. It is also one of the most intact and diverse ecosystems in this type of climate in the world. Please speak up against threatening our wild lands with mining. Your voice can make a difference. Sincerely, Emily Care2 and ThePetitionSite Team Forward to a friend >> http://go.care2.com/e/8aMY/VgoV/ANR12 Read the petition >> http://go.care2.com/e/8aMz/VgoV/ANR12

If We Drill in the U.S., We Don't Get the Oil One thing has been driving me crazy about this drilling debate -- everyone seems to assume that if we drill for oil in the US, that we will get the oil. And hence, we won't be dependent on foreign oil anymore. But we won't get anything, Exxon-Mobil will. The oil that comes from that drilling will not be United States property (Republicans aren't suggesting we nationalize the oil companies, are they?). It will be the property of whichever oil company got the rights to that contract. They can then sell it to whoever they like -- and they will. They will sell it on the world market, so the Chinese will have just as much access to the oil that comes out of the coast of Florida as we will. The Democrats have done a decent job of beating back the argument that this will effect prices in the short run, or even in the long run. But no one has addressed the point above. The Republicans make it seem like we won't be dependent on foreign oil -- and that prices will go down in the US -- if we have our own oil. But it won't be ours. And it will be sold on the world market, so its effect on global oil prices will be even smaller. When we ask the question of whether there should be drilling off the coast of Florida or in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, we should ask the question this way -- would you be comfortable with the Chinese or the Germans or Russians or the Saudis drilling on American land? Because for all intents and purposes, they will be. Large multi-national firms like Exxon-Mobil are not US property. They sell to the world and their allegiance is to corporate profits. So, when they drill, they drill for the whole world, not just us. Some might find that heart-warming, but it certainly has nothing to do with the US having more oil or lower prices.

EPA Leader Damaging Hope for the Future Sign Stephen Johnson's Termination Notice: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2167/t/5243/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=25312 The time has come to demand accountability from this administration and fire the head of the Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen Johnson. Global warming is now the most pressing threat to our health, environment, economy, and even national security. Emissions must be reduced now. But Administrator Johnson has done nothing as head of the Environmental Protection Agency except block progress on global warming. Under his "leadership" the EPA has: 1) Ignored its own scientists and buried their reports on the effects of global warming; 2) Refused to obey a Supreme Court ruling demanding action on greenhouse emissions under the Clean Air Act; and 3) Lied to Congress about the political interference that led to the refusal to regulate. Administrator Johnson is doing everything he can to prevent the EPA from actually protecting public health and the environment. Even worse, as the Bush administration draws to a close, Johnson will be looking to push through 11th hour changes with devastating effects. Join the Center for Biological Diversity and members of Congress in calling for the removal of Administrator Johnson. Sign his pink slip and we'll deliver it to Administrator Johnson and send a copy to your representatives in Congress: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2167/t/5243/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=25312 We need the EPA to lead our nation, pushing for cleaner air regulations and cutting down carbon emissions. Each day that Johnson remains in office puts the environment in more danger. He has to go. Tell Administrator Johnson his time is up. Thank you. Kieran Suckling Executive Director Center for Biological Diversity

Drugmaker Pfizer is claiming a new use for Viagra, which would conveniently treat the side effects of one of its other drugs. When headlines from 500 news sources screamed Women Need Viagra Too! on the basis of a new JAMA study this month, it looked like more Viagra huckstering as usual. The study boasted that 72 percent of its participants -- women with antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction (AASD) who had previously had normal sexual function and whose depression had lifted -- responded favorably to Viagra. That's an impressive claim until you see that the study size was only 98 -- or that Pfizer, the blue pill's manufacturer, paid for it. What's more, its two lead authors, H. George Nurnberg, M.D. and Paula L. Hensley, M.D., report being paid consultants to Pfizer (among dozens of other drug companies) and were participants on its speaker bureau in a previous JAMA study about Viagra for men with antidepressant-associated sexual dysfunction. And, Pfizer may be in trouble as it approaches the 2011-2013 Viagra/Lipitor "patent cliff" -- the sales falloff expected when patents expire. This comes on the heels of the Federal Aviation Administration's recent action banning pilots and air traffic controllers from taking Pfizer's anti-smoking drug Chantix. (Sell the company for parts, says Citigroup analyst John Boris, noting steady prescription decline since 2004.) Viagra use itself might be down as the economy squeezes consumers, since the prescriptions are often paid out of pocket, suggests CNBC pharmaceutical reporter Mike Huckman. Men may be cutting Viagra from their budgets -- or cutting pills in half. But the JAMA article might have less to do with opening new Viagra markets than with keeping the nation's 150 million antidepressant users -- 16 percent of all women between the ages of 20 and 44, according to one estimate -- from going off their meds because of sexual dysfunction side effects. Especially since Pfizer also makes the antidepressant Zoloft. About half of all people taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) like Zoloft experience sexual dysfunction such as loss of libido or anorgasmia, and as many as 90 percent go off their meds because of it, say researchers. That's a lot of lost patients. Viagra, or sildenafil citrate, works by inhibiting "cGMP catabolism" in the smooth muscle tissue of the clitoris and penis, which enhances the "cGMP activity" that enables tissue to respond to sexual stimulation -- possibly even when serotonin-altered, as is the case with women on antidepressants. Still, the study of women's sexual functioning even without the complication of other drugs is a science in its infancy: Not until June of 2005 did the first MRI of the clitoris show that it has 17 parts, with nerve endings extending deep inside a woman's body. Research suggests that male and female sexual functioning differ considerably, and past Viagra studies have failed to show convincing evidence of the drug's ability to increase sexual response in women. While one study in the British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology in 2001 showed potential, subsequent studies of sildenafil citrate in women didn't -- a Journal of Women's Health & Gender-Based Medicine study in 2004 concluded, "Any genital physiological effect of sildenafil was not perceived as improving the sexual response" -- and the search for parallel Viagra benefits was largely abandoned. Until now. The chance that a Viagra for women could still be viable was so riveting to the mainstream, scientific and investment press that some headlines this month declared that Viagra works in "depressed women" instead of "women on antidepressants" -- a big conceptual difference. Big pharma's male domination -- and Wall Street's -- has led feminists and sexuality researchers to question the whole pursuit of a female sexuality drug. If improving women's lives were really the goal, then why would the morning-after pill and other important reproductive drugs continue to languish while pharma forges ahead, trying to rope women into its renewed Viagra propaganda? Perhaps the answer lies in drug companies' uncanny ability to overlook more serious health concerns and instead exaggerate relatively minor ones. Market directly to consumers, and worried patients will ask for the drug by name. Pay off physicians, and they will overprescribe. Then, as drugs approach the end of their patents, discover a new use for them -- treating the side effects of other drugs. Call it disease-mongering with a side of sexism. If that is, in fact, pharma's strategy, based on the number of women taking antidepressants, it looks like it's working: A whopping 20 percent American women are being treated with prescription drugs for a variety of mental health disorders including depression, anxiety, seasonal affective disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, social anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, eating disorders, premenstrual dysphoric disorder -- even compulsive shopping. They are treated so aggressively that doctors will add a second drug or third drug for side effects rather than stop the first. The Zoloft page on the Pfizer Web site hucksters -- "If you have premenstrual dysphoric disorder you experience severe changes in your mood and body around the time of your period. Those changes can get in the way of day-to-day living" -- and the Viagra page is just a mouse click away. Get fuckin real. Pfizer gets enough from me with my Zoloft Rx. Been on the shit for years and the odds of me ever getting off are 0:0 Greedy bastards.

Obama Announces His New Energy Plan Obama said his energy plan would include a "use it or lose it" approach to oil leases, requiring oil companies to develop the 68 million acres already under lease, or be forced to turn the leases over to another company. But he emphasized that more drilling won't affect the price of gas significantly, while continued addiction to foreign oil puts the country in peril from an economic, environmental, and national security perspective. 4real new drilling is bullshit, a land grab that will do nothing at the pump now or 10 years from now. Enough of the oil bullshit. Time for real change in energy sources and consumption.

Quote of the Day: "Do you want our government to have the ability to track where you went, how you went, how you got there and when you got home? It would be naïve for someone to think this information will not be abused in the future. Virtually every decade these kinds of files have been used to violate people's privacy." -- Brian Schweitzer, Governor of Montana <http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/4213> Subject: Chertoff threatens governor, governor threatens Chertoff We knew that the state of Montana was resisting the REAL ID Act, but we just learned some of the details of that resistance. The story is so good we had to share it, in case you hadn't heard . . . Brian Schweitzer, the governor of Montana, wrote a letter to Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff. The letter informed Chertoff that Montana would not be complying with the REAL ID Act. Our quote of the day supplies one of the reasons for Governor Schweitzer's rebellion. In response to the letter . . . Secretary Chertoff called Governor Schweitzer and threatened him. Chertoff told Schweitzer that Montana residents would be banned from airplanes, or subjected to severe, time-consuming inspections at airports. The Governor countered with his own threat, "How about we both go on 60 Minutes a few days after the DHS starts patting down Montana driver's license-holders who are trying to get on the planes and both of us can tell our side of the story." Chertoff didn't like that suggestion. He said, "I see the problem. We need to get this fixed." So far, the "fix" involves granting Montana and all other rebellious states an extension of the deadline for complying with the REAL ID Act. But the real fix is to repeal REAL ID. Have you protested to your elected representatives that the Secretary of Homeland Security has been threatening the citizens of states that don't comply with REAL ID? If not, please do so. You can mention the Chertoff-Schweitzer exchange in your personal comments. Ask Congress to repeal the REAL ID Act. You can send your message here. <http://www.downsizedc.org/etp/campaigns/30> If you've sent a REAL ID Act message recently, consider sending another "I am not afraid" message. We have a lot of new people who probably aren't familiar with our "I am not afraid" campaign. You can check it out here. <http://www.downsizedc.org/etp/campaigns/77>

I like engineering an empire and ancient almanac Hist international and nat geo. HI had a thing about the real dragon emperor and the unification of China. cool shitz

eeek underwire pokin into yer lung would hurt >.<

noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo ooooooooooo oooo

ooh seriously. Sometimes my meds make me clench or grind my teeth in my sleep really bad. I get up with a mouth (jaw) that almost feels frozen in place cuz it totally hurts to move it! usually its the clenching my teeth in my sleep that does it. My dentist says a sleeping persons bite is stronger(normal restrictions are off) and its enough to break bone. I snapped off a quarter of a molar and swalloed it (no pain even after the break o.0) in my sleep. My dentist shit when he had to repair the tooth. he was like that doesnt hurt?! I was like no been this way fer 2 years chocolate bothers it some .... X'D gawds I hate the dentist. if it persists try a bite plate thingy makes ya feel handicap as hell going to sleep with this dumb ass rubber thing in yer mouth but at least ya wont bust up yer teeth like I did