DeathscytheX

It's funny to read the comments, there is a lot of mixed reactions from OMG to bleh. It looked like what you would expect from a next gen Nukem, yet you saw so little. I just thought it was pretty neat to see a some proof finally. lol

http://kotaku.com/5013638/first-duke-nukem-forever-gameplay-video For those that care. I never really was a Nukem fan myself.

You mean harvesting ice off comets? I'm not sure if the ice is actually water on comets that fly near our solar system, it might be an option if so. As for faster travel, the human body is putting a cap on that. Until we figure out how to reverse G-force, there is only so fast we can go without turning the people inside the craft into soup. Most of the concepts I have seen revolve around a large spinning craft or space station that creates and artificial gravity inside of it, and is large enough to store food for the required time to get to Mars. There was suppose to be a hypersonic flight test a few months ago but I never heard if it took place or not.

I think it will be ok on the road if the suspension is done correctly. But for those times you might have to swerve off the road because of some jackass, you're pretty much dead. X_X I think we need to stick to the 4 tire system. I can't imagine the labor costs for regular maintenance, it looks like you have to disassemble a lot of shit to fix anything. @_@ Interesting concept, maybe we will all be driving saucers on wheels one day. X'D

http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/tech/2008/06/05/washburn.230.mpg.car.kfmb Its a Video. Pretty nifty.

http://edition.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/06/08/japan.stabbing.spree/index.html wtf...

Hmmm I wonder what ever happened to the God of War movie.

It certainly would help having a drinkable water source on hand rather than having to transport it off the planet. Not only for a moon base, but a check point to any mission to Mars that ever occurs.

Oops. It was like 2 in the morning. X'D

Which consoles have you owned throughout your gaming life, include the ones you own now in your list. Mine: Atari 2600 Atari 5200 Nintendo Entertainment System Game Boy (yes the original brick sized one ) Sega Genesis Playstation Playstation 2 Game Boy Advance Game Boy Advance SP Playstation 3 Xbox 360 Wii

I'm actually quite entertained. This has been ruined. X'D I think Lady was dropping a hint.

http://www.space.com/searchforlife/080605-seti-moon-water.html

It took Hitler 3 or 4 elections to get his party into the Reichstag, his party got in with a very small percentage (and hardly any seats) and slowly gained support from there. Ron Paul is kind of old, so I will give you the fact that he may never become president, but who knows what would have happened if he was a bit younger. Here is a freebie. Ron Paul wants the US to withdraw from the UN correct? Hitler withdrew Germany from its predecessor the League of Nations. You can try to twist it any way you want. I never said Ron Paul is exactly like Hitler. I said he can be compared to Hitler better than any other candidate (only because you put the word Replublican and Nazi together). Yes they have different polices, but they have more similar ones than McCain, Hillary, and Obama. Thus he is more like Hitler than any other candidate even if he had just 1 more comparable policy than the rest. Hell, I'm not too sure Obama even knows what foreign policy is, it would be pretty hard to have comparisons when you don't have anything to compare. On the other hand you have done nothing to prove that Republicans are Nazis, although its funny in itself you say that, and Paul is currently residing in that party. All your video has proven is that McCain isn't very sharp on his history. You say he is a racist and wants to start wars... Pharaohs of Egypt were and did that, and just about every other ancient civilization. They started wars and hated the Jews. You can bash him all you wish, I certainly won't stand up for him. He's not a Nazi though.

Republican Nazi Ideals = No Such Thing. Democrat Communists = uhhhh no. I didn't hate you're terminology, you were just incorrect. There were plenty of racists before and after Hitler, but he never called for preemptive strikes, he marched into country to take them over, not to prevent them from attacking Germany first. When did a senile old man become the focal point anyways... thats ok, you can bask in ignorance all you wish. But if you are going to go slander others political beliefs by adding negative connotations at the ends of them, you shouldn't be all touchy when someone brings up yours. Oh, you didn't offend me by no means, I don't consider myself affiliated with either party. I just don't like falsities.

Working, Drinking, Sleeping, Video Games.

*tsk tsk* Grasping at straws now? You still don't get it. No McCain doesn't share similar polices with Hitler. Hey Kublai Khan continued Ghengis Khans wars, we can all compare McCain to him. X'D You should just keep the word Nazi and Communist to yourself, and not tact them on to anything you don't fully understand, or just because you don't agree with a group of people. I don't really care about your political affiliations or the fact that you support Ron Paul. I don't think you are wrong for doing so. Just don't use bad terminology.

That isn't even what I said. Do you really have a hard time comprehending words and sentences? It seems like you don't even read it all and just jump to random conclusions that make absolutely no sense. Or are you trying to warp what I have been saying because you obviously see that there is nothing you can put up against my statements. This is exactly why I just said what I did about wasting time trying to explain anything to you. Just out of the kindness of my heart here is one last attempt: You say the Republican party has Nazi Ideals... they don't, you can't prove it because its not there. Socially the NSDAP was the exact opposite of the Republican party on many fronts. My point was simply to state how bad of a comparison it was, and then turn around to say that Ron Paul's (The person you support) policies on an international scale and on a national scale are similar to what Adolf Hitler did in Germany BEFORE World War II. I don't know how many times I have said before WWII, but you seem to ignore that part every time, and then try to say that I said Ron Paul will start WWIII. Then again you didn't quote me, because you couldn't. Hitler did a lot more than just start a war. He took a decaying Germany and turned it to the biggest industrial and economic power in Europe among other things that you obviously aren't aware of. The conclusion you should have came to was that Ron Paul was more similar to the Nazi's in a certain aspect than the entire republican party. I never said in a bad way, you just assumed that based of the negative connotations of National Socialism. Just because Bush started a war doesn't make him a Nazi, that's purely an idiotic statement. More factions have started wars than just them. Even if I was wrong... and I promise I am not, how could you expect to prove me wrong when you have so little information about the Nazis.

Oh really? When did I say Ron Paul would start a war? Quote me on it. Basically the general education in school is that the Nazi's started World War II and killed 6 million jews, putting Hitler as the mastermind behind all of it. You have displayed that you know that, but its entirely watered down and in the overall picture... incorrect. Its a lot more complex than that. Hitler didn't bust down the door of the Reichstag and start WWII on day one... it was almost 6 years after he was in office, They barely even mention anything about those years, its not common knowledge. *shrugs* I could spend an hour or two putting together a side by side comparison, but why should I waste my time on you? You'll just say a bunch of logic defying, overly opinionated, garbage with no solid foundation (aka real facts) because you can't really dispute what I have said. The proof is in the fact that it really happened. I told you it was there, you can look it up on your own time. You know what Paul stands for, I gave you the correct years in German history. I have nothing to hide, I spent four years learning everything about it myself. It doesn't matter to me if you investigate for yourself or not. Just because you don't know about it doesn't make it wrong. Thats a pathetic way to go about things.

Even the reader reviews on RT suck. They say how bad it was, but offer no explanation as to why it was bad. I'm the type of person that will go to a bad horror flick to get a good laugh, but I was pretty impressed with this one. I don't hail it to be one of the greatest, but it was pleasantly refreshing.

Seeing as I majored in History on the focal point of Nazi Germany, I am more than informed than you could imagine. While your knowledge seems to be limited to the fact that Hitler started World War II, I stated, what he did before World War II in governing Germany bares striking resemblances to what Ron Paul invisions. Just as no one knew what Hitler would do back then, the same applies for Ron Paul now. You can think he is a constitutionalist all you'd like, and he may be... but only Ron Paul knows what he really is. I'm not saying Ron Paul would invade mexico and canada, and let his cabinet formulate a plan to send millions to their death in execution facilities. I'm bringing to light a legitimate statement that you could make a more frighteningly solid case against Ron Paul than you could the entire Republican party, which is known to support a lot of things in this country that Hitler despised in his own. You can try to refute historical events all you wish, but you will be wrong.

A very strong case could be made that Ron Paul's opinions could be more closely compared to Hitler's than any other candidate. Its actually pretty frightening if you look at the history of Germany 1933-1939, just before World War II started. You can't just go throwing the word Communist and Nazi around as an insult. Misinformed statements like that are the same tactics used by the mass media to enslave the mind. Anyways, you have a 72 year old man that could kick the bucket in office, and you have a man that is at high risk for assassination. Its not looking good. Wow, McCain will be even older than Regan was if he takes office. The pool of candidates is definitely stale, and probably will remain that way for another two decades unless a massive ousting of incumbents takes place over that time. Its just a part of the process, just look down the list of the Presidents, 14 of them are pretty much lame ducks. Even most historians couldn't tell you much about them off the top of their heads. We've been rolling out the big names since 1929, sadly it started going dry last election. John Kerry? please... There wasn't much competition for W. Thats why he won. Now both sides are kind of ... eh. Its going to be up to the other branches of our government to pull most of the weight for a while... luckily thats why we have 3.

I went to see this today despite the many bad reviews. Needless to say, this is one of those films critics don't understand. If you like suspense, this is your rush. It defies most conventional horror stereotypical moments for effect. The film relies on camera work, and.... whats this? Acting?! In a horror flick?! NO WAY! Anyways, Its worth an matinée viewing at least. It was definitely a lot better than most of the shitty horror that has been coming out the past decade.

I've been working retail for 7 years now. If you can't handle something like that, I suggest looking for a new job, because it only gets worse. 80% of people shopping at the grocery store are some of the most lazy, ignorant, pieces of garbage on the face of this earth.